Join NCAC Now

» art» media» literature» science» internet» education» entertainment

EXPRESS YOURSELF!


 in support of free expression



The information presented here by the National Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC) may be freely redistributed in its entirety, provided that readers are informed that the information was obtained from NCAC's World Wide Web site and that credit is given to the appropriate source of whatever information is used. Permission is expressly granted for the information obtained to be made available for file transfer from installations offering unrestricted anonymous file transfer on the Internet. Information found here may not be sold for profit or incorporated in commercial documents without the written permission from the National Coalition Against Censorship.

©Copyright 2005 NCAC
WEB DESIGN
Jeanne Criscola Criscola Design

free speech first amendment censorship

 

news

Letter Opposing Censorship of health Teacher at Fort Herriman Middle School, UT


 

Principal Michael Sirios
Fort Herriman Middle School
14058 South Mirabella Drive
Herriman, Utah 84096
michael.sirois@jordan.k12.ut.us

Barry L. Newbold, Ed.D., Superintendent
Jordan School District
9361 S. 300 East
Sandy, UT 84070
administration@jordandistrict.org

June 23, 2008

Dear Superintendent Newbold and Principal Sirios,

We write regarding complaints about a middle school health teacher who apparently responded to students’ questions in a sex education class about homosexuality, masturbation and oral sex.  We understand some parents have called for her termination and that in response the district has put her on paid-administrative leave while conducting an investigation.  

Even if the facts alleged are true, it cannot be a punishable offense for a teacher to answer students’ questions that are relevant to the subject area of the course. Moreover, a school policy to deny students access to accurate health information because of objections based on religious or moral beliefs, would raise serious First Amendment concerns.

Without questioning the sincerity of those who object to the content discussed in the health class, their views are not shared by all, and they have no right to impose those views on others or to demand that the educational program reflect their personal preferences.  Efforts to impose particular viewpoints about sex — and to prohibit discussion of controversial information or ideas — constitute a particularly dangerous form of censorship.  Trying to "protect" young people from the facts about sex denies them access to potentially life-saving information and precludes informed discussion about a critical aspect of life.

Furthermore, disciplining a teacher for addressing material within the scope of the subject of the class creates a chilling effect on classroom discussion and learning.  Such an environment impels teachers to avoid or ignore difficult student questions and to censor any material to which even a single parent might object.  Silencing class discussion on the basis of particular, ideologically-based views casts a “pall of orthodoxy” over the school, Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 603 (1967), and is destructive of First Amendment principles and informed, open dialogue.  It is the role of public education institutions to serve as models for the kind of informed and respectful debate that is essential in a democracy.  Such a debate is impossible if teachers fear a possible dismissal every time they address controversial material.

Students should be encouraged to seek information from reliable and informed sources, like their teachers.  By penalizing the teacher in this case, you not only discourage them from doing so, but also increase the likelihood that they will turn to inaccurate sources and rely on gossip and uninformed hearsay from their peers.  The consequences of acting on misinformation about sexual health can be severe, even life-threatening.

We strongly urge you to adopt practices and policies that respect your students’ right to uncensored information and discussion in their classrooms, and that you resist the urge to appease critics by sacrificing a teacher who was only doing her job.    

If we can be of assistance in this matter, please do not hesitate to call us.
 
Sincerely,

Joan Bertin
Executive Director
National Coalition Against Censorship


Related Articles

»Teacher's sex-ed talk riles parents (Salt Lake Tribune, 5/30/08) CALIFORNIA — Shasta High School will have a journalism class next year after all, even though the school principal planned to eliminate the course after The Volcano ran a photo of students burning an American flag. Superintendent Mike Stuart said Thursday he plans to give the school funding for the program so it can build enrollment.

» Teaching the birds and the bees; instructors get stung (Salt Lake Tribune, 6/08/08) Many parents at Fort Herriman Middle School, in fact, know exactly where they are in favor of stringent restrictions on what teachers may talk about when they talk about human sexuality. It's clear, too, that some Utahns side with Armenta. What isn't in dispute is that when Jordan School District placed the health teacher on paid administrative leave pending an investigation, it became the first time in years that sex education in Utah was the subject of public discourse.

 

 

 

 

 

Action Alerts

» National

» Eastern

» Central

» Mountain

» Pacific


» email alert sign-up


» report censorship!