- action | issues
- Academic Freedom
- Books
- Classrooms
- Copyright
- Film
- Government Secrecy
- Hate Speech
- Internet
- LGBT
- Libraries
- Music
- Nudity & Pornography
- Political Correctness
- Political Dissent
- Public Spaces
- Race Ethnicity Gender
- Radio & Television
- Religion
- Science
- Sex Education
- Theater & Performance
- Video Games
- Violence
- Visual Art
- Youth
- advocacy | projects
- education | resources
in support of free expression
The information presented here by the National
Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC) may be freely redistributed in its entirety,
provided that readers are informed that the information was obtained from
NCAC's World Wide Web site and that credit is given to the appropriate source
of whatever information is used. Permission is expressly granted for the information
obtained to be made available for file transfer from installations offering
unrestricted anonymous file transfer on the Internet. Information found here
may not be sold for profit or incorporated in commercial documents without
the written permission from the National Coalition Against Censorship.
©Copyright 2005 NCAC
WEB DESIGN
Jeanne Criscola Criscola Design
NATIONAL COALITION AGAINST CENSORSHIP HAILS RECENT U.S. SUPREME COURT RULING AS VICTORY FOR FREE SPEECH
For Immediate Release
April 16, 2002
New York, NY
The National Coalition Against Censorship praised today's 6-3 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition that struck down the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 as overbroad and unconstitutional. The statute that was struck down by the ruling prohibited "any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer-generated image or picture" that "is or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct."
In today's ruling, the Court declared that the CPPA extended child pornography laws in ways that violated the First Amendment and did not comply with existing obscenity laws. The Court also rejected government arguments that the CPPA was necessary to protect children. Past rulings by the Court addressing this issue have outlawed child pornography based on multiple factors including the harm caused to the children involved by the production and dissemination of such material. However, today the Court distinguished the difference between the use of real children and the use of images or actors that "appear to be" or "convey the impression" of minors in declaring the CPPA unconstitutional.
"Congress passed an indefensible law that, on its face, would criminalize various scenes in movies like Traffic and America Beauty and make production and possession punishable by up to 15 years of prison," said Joan Bertin, Executive Director of the National Coalition Against Censorship. "As the Supreme Court recognized, numerous other laws suffice to protect children from sexual exploitation and predation, making this overbroad restriction on speech unnecessary," added Bertin.
Action Alerts
