
in support of free expression
The information presented here by the National
Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC) may be freely redistributed in its entirety,
provided that readers are informed that the information was obtained from
NCAC's World Wide Web site and that credit is given to the appropriate source
of whatever information is used. Permission is expressly granted for the information
obtained to be made available for file transfer from installations offering
unrestricted anonymous file transfer on the Internet. Information found here
may not be sold for profit or incorporated in commercial documents without
the written permission from the National Coalition Against Censorship.
©Copyright 2005 NCAC
WEB DESIGN
Jeanne Criscola Criscola Design
free speech first amendment censorship
|
|
|
Public Funding |
Public
funding for the arts does not allow the government
to play the role of censor. While the government
has considerable leeway in determining what and
whom to fund, it may not do so in a vague
or viewpoint-based
manner. Although the government is not required
to subsidize arts programs, once it does so it cannot
rescind funding because of disagreement with the
viewpoint expressed in a particular work. For example,
the government may evaluate grant applicants on
the basis of artistic excellence or general standards
of decency,
but it may not solely fund works promoting Christianity
or Republicanism or deny funding because of antipathy
to the views expressed by a particular work or artist.
The government also cannot punish a particular museum
or organization by rescinding funding if it opposes
the ideas expressed by the institution, through
its programming or otherwise.
Notwithstanding these relatively simple principles,
publicly-funded arts institutions routinely come
under attack for work that is controversial in any
ground – sex, religion, political viewpoint,
etc. |
|
Associated Cases: |
| These
materials are not intended, and should not be used, as
legal advice. They necessarily contain generalizations
that are not applicable in all jurisdictions or circumstances.
Moreover, court decisions may be superceded by subsequent
rulings, and may be subject to alternative interpretations.
Corrections, clarification, and additions are welcome.
Please send to ncac@ncac.org. |
|
Action Alerts
» National
» Eastern
» Central
» Mountain
» Pacific
» email alert sign-up
» report censorship!
|