Join NCAC Now

» art» media» literature» science» internet» education» entertainment

EXPRESS YOURSELF!


 in support of free expression



The information presented here by the National Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC) may be freely redistributed in its entirety, provided that readers are informed that the information was obtained from NCAC's World Wide Web site and that credit is given to the appropriate source of whatever information is used. Permission is expressly granted for the information obtained to be made available for file transfer from installations offering unrestricted anonymous file transfer on the Internet. Information found here may not be sold for profit or incorporated in commercial documents without the written permission from the National Coalition Against Censorship.

©Copyright 2005 NCAC
WEB DESIGN
Jeanne Criscola Criscola Design

free speech first amendment censorship

 

Libel, Slander, and Defamation

Defamation is the act of harming the reputation of another by making a false statement to a third person. There are two types of defamatory acts: Libel is a defamatory statement expressed in a fixed medium, e.g. writing, art, picture or sign. Slander, on the other hand, is a defamatory statement expressed in a transitory form, e.g. speech.

The legal analysis of injuries to reputation depends on whether the individual is a “public figure.” Public figures are well-known or notable persons of substantial public interest, such as celebrities, movie stars, athletes, musicians, politicians, government official, or business leaders. Individuals may become public figures for limited purposes, if they have “thrust themselves to the forefront of particular public controversies.”

Public figures must demonstrate that the allegedly defamatory statement was false and was made with actual malice or reckless disregard for the truth. Cases involving non-public figures are easier to prove, and generally require, in addition to proving falsity, only proof of negligence.

Defamation is not to be confused with insult, upset feelings or emotional distress, which may or may not result from statements that are actually false and injure one’s reputation.
 

Associated Cases:

Nelson v. Streeter
Sefick v. Gardner
Simeonov v. Tiegs
These materials are not intended, and should not be used, as legal advice. They necessarily contain generalizations that are not applicable in all jurisdictions or circumstances. Moreover, court decisions may be superceded by subsequent rulings, and may be subject to alternative interpretations. Corrections, clarification, and additions are welcome. Please send to ncac@ncac.org.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Action Alerts

» National

» Eastern

» Central

» Mountain

» Pacific


» email alert sign-up


» report censorship!