
in support of free expression
The information presented here by the National
Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC) may be freely redistributed in its entirety,
provided that readers are informed that the information was obtained from
NCAC's World Wide Web site and that credit is given to the appropriate source
of whatever information is used. Permission is expressly granted for the information
obtained to be made available for file transfer from installations offering
unrestricted anonymous file transfer on the Internet. Information found here
may not be sold for profit or incorporated in commercial documents without
the written permission from the National Coalition Against Censorship.
©Copyright 2005 NCAC
WEB DESIGN
Jeanne Criscola Criscola Design
free speech first amendment censorship
|
|
|
|
|
Two
sculptors created a site-specific sculpture in
the lobby of a building. After the new building
owners removed the sculpture without permission,
the artists sued for violations of the Visual
Artists Rights Act (VARA). VARA prohibits the
distortion, mutilation, or other modification
of an artist’s work, but does not extend
to “works made for hire” (where, depending
upon the circumstances, the party who has commissioned
the work is deemed to be the creator and original
owner of it). VARA generally aims to protect two
rights:
| • |
The
right of "integrity" which allows
the creator of the work to prevent any deforming
or mutilating changes to a work, even after
he or she has transferred ownership of the
work. |
| • |
The
right of "attribution" which generally
consists of the artist’s right to be
recognized by name as the author of a work
and to prevent creation of the work from being
attributed to someone else. This right includes
the right to prevent use of the author's name
on works created by others, including distorted
editions of the author's original work. |
However,
because the court concluded the artists’
sculpture here was a work made for hire, it was
not protected by VARA. Factors considered in determining
whether a work was produced for hire include the
artist’s right to control the manner and
means by which the product was produced, the location
of the work, the duration of the relationship
between the parties, the method of payment and
provision of employee benefits, and the tax treatment
of the artist. |
|
| These
materials are not intended, and should not be used, as
legal advice. They necessarily contain generalizations
that are not applicable in all jurisdictions or circumstances.
Moreover, court decisions may be superceded by subsequent
rulings, and may be subject to alternative interpretations.
Corrections, clarification, and additions are welcome.
Please send to ncac@ncac.org. |
|
Action Alerts
» National
» Eastern
» Central
» Mountain
» Pacific
» email alert sign-up
» report censorship!
|